Porter, Doug. "How the Government Encourages Obesity: The High Fructose Corn Syrup Story." 13 Jan. 2009. Web.
This article helps people understand a little bit more about corn subsidizing. It explains some background information and then goes on explaining the problem with corn now, which is how it helps us get fatter. It also explains how the rush to corn is also causing an environmental toll and also gives reasons why people should be informed about corn subsidies.
Chameides, Bill. "Corn Subsidies: How Congress Is Shortchanging Our Health.” 28 Apr. 2008. Web.
This article talks about how the government encourages obesity by subsidizing corn. How they use Ads on TV and spend more than 20 million dollars and sometimes more to send us a “safe message” about corn syrup. Also, how the corn syrup industry has always vigorously defended its territory for obvious reasons but how a few brave scientists noticed what seemed to be a relationship between the increases in obesity and corn syrup’s increasingly sweet market share and finally decided to say something. It explains how this also has a negative effect in our environment.
Hopkins, Kate. "Tariffs and Subsidies - The Literal Cost of High Fructose Corn Syrup." Web log post. Www.accidentalhedonist.com. Web. 24 Jan. 2006.
In this article, the author talks about the reasons why companies use HFCS and why HFCS is cheaper than sugar. He explains what is subsidy and makes it easy for the readers understand it. He explains what Archer Daniels Midland Corporation (ADM); a big player in the corn industry is and how it works.
BARRIONUEVO, ALEXEI. "Mountains of Corn and a Sea of Farm Subsidies." The New York Times 09 Nov. 2005. Print
This article is about the largest corn crop in history in 2005. This was too much of a good thing, drawing attention to what critics called a contradiction of the government farm subsidy program: America's efficient farmers were encouraged to produce far more than the country can use, depressing prices and raising subsidy payments. In other words, because the government wants to help America's farmers, it essentially ends up paying them both when they produce too much and when their crop prices are too low. It also gives amounts of how much the government pays on corn subsidies from 1995-2004.
Pollan, Michael. "Weed It and Reap." The New York Times [New York City] 04 Nov. 2007. Print.
An article written by Michael Pollan where he explains that in the year 2007, people finally began to ask themselves why the government keeps subsidizing corn if America is facing an obesity and diabetes epidemic. “For the first time, the public health community has raised its voice in support of overturning farm policies that subsidize precisely the wrong kind of calories”.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Friday, May 14, 2010
draft #2 essay 1
Fast food is famous all around America not only because is good tasting, quick, and convenient but mostly because it’s extremely cheap. It is very popular because with less than $5.00, you can get a filling meal. You can come across a fast food restaurant anywhere you go and it is always full with people. However, fast food is made with cheap ingredients such as high fat meat, refined grains, and added sugar and fats, instead of nutritious foods such as lean meats, fresh fruits, and vegetables. This is why as we all know, America is facing an obesity epidemic, specially children. The fast food chain use children as their main target for adverting anywhere possible but what is very aggravating is the fact that even schools are now serving and promoting fast food even though they know it‘s very unhealthy.
The Fast food industry has grown enormously over the years due to its advertising strategies. In chapter 2, “Your Trusted Friends” from his book Fast food Nation, Eric Schlosser makes the reader become aware of techniques fast food restaurants such as McDonald’s use to advertise their products. He explains why children have become the main target for advertising. “The aim of most children’s advertising is straightforward: get kids to nag their parents and nag them well” (pg43). He makes it very clear that the reason why advertisers go after children is because parents will buy anything for their kids as long as they stop nagging. Another reason why kids are its main target is because children are easily influenced by commercials on TV or ads they see on the street so kids are more likely to be tempted and ask their parents for that certain product being advertise.
“Not satisfied with marketing to children through playgrounds, toys, cartoons, movies, videos, charities, and amusements parks, through contests, sweepstakes, games, and clubs, via television, radio, magazines, and the Internet” (pg.51) says Eric Schlosser, fast food chains are now even advertise and served in most public schools. Fast food should not be advertised or served in schools because this will only confuse the kids and make them think eating fast food is right since they are told by their parents that school is safe place where they go to learn good things that will help them in their future. So if they see an ad of a hamburger with French fries around the hallways they will be given a good image of fast food. What the kids don‘t know is that as good tasting as it may be, this type of food ruins their health. Parents send their kids to school every morning trusting the school with their kids’ safety but what doesn’t cross their mind is that they should also be concerned about what their kids are being served for lunch.
I decided to take a trip to my cousin’s middle-school and see what she was eating for lunch myself. As soon as I walked in the lunchroom, I came across 3 vending machines. Two were full of junk food and the other one contained every type of soda brand including Coca Cola, Sprite, Pepsi and a few others. The menu for that day was cheeseburger, chicken nuggets, or pizza. The children have the option to pick one of these and it’s served along with French Fries including a little bag with mayonnaise and ketchup. Is it very upsetting to see that although most children consider school to be their second home, they are being fed food that will damage their health system. Instead of serving and helping advertise fast food, schools need be teaching the children why eating healthy food is important and how unhealthy and dangerous the consequences of eating fast food can be. Perhaps a health class where the children can learn ways to have a healthy lifestyle such as exercising, eating a balanced diet, taking vitamins etc. will help prevent children from eating as much junk food. Or better yet, the schools can simply stop selling, serving and advertising junk food.
Now a days, obesity in children is a massive problem. The main cause of obesity is obviously the unhealthy life-style children carry. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that “some very obese children have high blood pressure and cholesterol. And Kaiser experts treat some teens with Type 2 diabetes, a weight-linked disease that normally hits adults older than 40” says Andy Dworkin in his article Health Every Period. It is very dangerous and life-risking for children to have these type of diseases and if advertising for fast food in schools continue, this will only increase the amount of obese children. Isn’t incredible to think that if children keep on eating processed food, their lives will be shorter than their own parents?.
In conclusion, There is a place and time for everything and school is simply not the right place for fast food adverting. School shouldn’t have ads or serve fast food to the children because this is only making the obesity rate increase. Kids spend half their day in school and should be learning stuff that will be for their own benefit instead of being served food that is putting them in risk of suffering from diseases that can cause their own death.
Dworkin, Andy. "Health Every Period." Editorial. 24 Mar. 2010. Web.
Schlosser, Eric. “Your Trusted Friends.” Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001. 31-58. Print.
The Fast food industry has grown enormously over the years due to its advertising strategies. In chapter 2, “Your Trusted Friends” from his book Fast food Nation, Eric Schlosser makes the reader become aware of techniques fast food restaurants such as McDonald’s use to advertise their products. He explains why children have become the main target for advertising. “The aim of most children’s advertising is straightforward: get kids to nag their parents and nag them well” (pg43). He makes it very clear that the reason why advertisers go after children is because parents will buy anything for their kids as long as they stop nagging. Another reason why kids are its main target is because children are easily influenced by commercials on TV or ads they see on the street so kids are more likely to be tempted and ask their parents for that certain product being advertise.
“Not satisfied with marketing to children through playgrounds, toys, cartoons, movies, videos, charities, and amusements parks, through contests, sweepstakes, games, and clubs, via television, radio, magazines, and the Internet” (pg.51) says Eric Schlosser, fast food chains are now even advertise and served in most public schools. Fast food should not be advertised or served in schools because this will only confuse the kids and make them think eating fast food is right since they are told by their parents that school is safe place where they go to learn good things that will help them in their future. So if they see an ad of a hamburger with French fries around the hallways they will be given a good image of fast food. What the kids don‘t know is that as good tasting as it may be, this type of food ruins their health. Parents send their kids to school every morning trusting the school with their kids’ safety but what doesn’t cross their mind is that they should also be concerned about what their kids are being served for lunch.
I decided to take a trip to my cousin’s middle-school and see what she was eating for lunch myself. As soon as I walked in the lunchroom, I came across 3 vending machines. Two were full of junk food and the other one contained every type of soda brand including Coca Cola, Sprite, Pepsi and a few others. The menu for that day was cheeseburger, chicken nuggets, or pizza. The children have the option to pick one of these and it’s served along with French Fries including a little bag with mayonnaise and ketchup. Is it very upsetting to see that although most children consider school to be their second home, they are being fed food that will damage their health system. Instead of serving and helping advertise fast food, schools need be teaching the children why eating healthy food is important and how unhealthy and dangerous the consequences of eating fast food can be. Perhaps a health class where the children can learn ways to have a healthy lifestyle such as exercising, eating a balanced diet, taking vitamins etc. will help prevent children from eating as much junk food. Or better yet, the schools can simply stop selling, serving and advertising junk food.
Now a days, obesity in children is a massive problem. The main cause of obesity is obviously the unhealthy life-style children carry. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that “some very obese children have high blood pressure and cholesterol. And Kaiser experts treat some teens with Type 2 diabetes, a weight-linked disease that normally hits adults older than 40” says Andy Dworkin in his article Health Every Period. It is very dangerous and life-risking for children to have these type of diseases and if advertising for fast food in schools continue, this will only increase the amount of obese children. Isn’t incredible to think that if children keep on eating processed food, their lives will be shorter than their own parents?.
In conclusion, There is a place and time for everything and school is simply not the right place for fast food adverting. School shouldn’t have ads or serve fast food to the children because this is only making the obesity rate increase. Kids spend half their day in school and should be learning stuff that will be for their own benefit instead of being served food that is putting them in risk of suffering from diseases that can cause their own death.
Dworkin, Andy. "Health Every Period." Editorial. 24 Mar. 2010. Web.
Schlosser, Eric. “Your Trusted Friends.” Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001. 31-58. Print.
Monday, May 3, 2010
Soda Tax Response
New York governor David Paterson included a proposal soda tax in his budget plan last year and it was rejected. However, he brought up the soda tax proposal again this year on January, 2010. The state of New York will have to pay one more penny per once on soda and other sweetened beverages. He says that the tax is necessary to fight obesity, especially on children. According to studies, this will help reduce soda consumption by 15% and will help raise around $24 billion in four years to help health reforms.
Although this soda tax proposal doesn't sound like a bad idea, it would not make much of a difference on soda consumption but will certainly increase the governments budget. Americans should be free to make their own decisions on what they want to eat, whether its healthy. It’s not the government’s responsibility to try and fix our diet. "Taxes are not going to teach our children how to have a healthy lifestyle," said Susan Neely, president of the American Beverage Association. This in fact is true, taxes are not going to make people healthy just because soda will cost a couple of cents more. States that are already paying such tax also show high obesity rates so taxing soda is simply another way of raising revenue. The government knows this tax wouldn't stop people from consuming soda and this is the reason why they insist it goes through. As long as they have their money, that's all it matters. If the government cared so much about our children’s health, why only tax soda if it's not the only product in the market causing obesity?. Taxing soda is not going to reduce obesity, it will only increase consumption of other high calorie drinks.
Although this soda tax proposal doesn't sound like a bad idea, it would not make much of a difference on soda consumption but will certainly increase the governments budget. Americans should be free to make their own decisions on what they want to eat, whether its healthy. It’s not the government’s responsibility to try and fix our diet. "Taxes are not going to teach our children how to have a healthy lifestyle," said Susan Neely, president of the American Beverage Association. This in fact is true, taxes are not going to make people healthy just because soda will cost a couple of cents more. States that are already paying such tax also show high obesity rates so taxing soda is simply another way of raising revenue. The government knows this tax wouldn't stop people from consuming soda and this is the reason why they insist it goes through. As long as they have their money, that's all it matters. If the government cared so much about our children’s health, why only tax soda if it's not the only product in the market causing obesity?. Taxing soda is not going to reduce obesity, it will only increase consumption of other high calorie drinks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)